lucio opened issue co-op/docs#4 2026-10-16 17:14:32 +00:00
Incorrect claim for new qwen 3.5 model
lucio commented on issue co-op/support#22 2026-10-16 16:55:34 +00:00
Provider evaluation: Regolo.ai (EU, zero-retention) as Apertus/alternative provider — suggested by @lucio

Stage 1 makes sense to me. If I understand right, "large multimodal model" is already satisfied by deepseek-v4.1-flash, and the cost difference on gpt-oss-120b makes that an unsatisfactory…

lucio commented on issue co-op/support#22 2026-10-15 19:34:30 +00:00
Provider evaluation: Regolo.ai (EU, zero-retention) as Apertus/alternative provider — suggested by @lucio

Looks good. This is further than I got -- I was mostly looking into their sustainability.

lucio commented on issue co-op/support#9 2026-10-14 21:16:03 +00:00
Toward the next governance model

Yeah, that makes more sense to me

lucio commented on issue co-op/support#9 2026-10-14 17:45:04 +00:00
Toward the next governance model

What does it mean to manage but not resolve disputes? The later phrase "Disputes that cannot be resolved within the co-op" seems to contradict it.