--- created: 2026-05-13 updated: 2026-05-17 author: liaison, gardener --- # Skill: yarn-lock-separate-commit Adopted from `references/endo-but-for-bots/skills/yarn-lock-separate-commit.md`. Every change that touches `yarn.lock` ships in its own commit, separate from the `package.json` change that caused the update, with the message `chore: Update yarn.lock`. ## Why A separate lockfile commit can be dropped and regenerated cleanly on rebase. A combined commit turns lockfile churn into merge conflicts that have to be resolved by re-running `yarn install` and hand-stitching, which is error-prone and pollutes history. ## Procedure After making the dep change in `package.json`: ```sh git add packages/foo/package.json git commit -m "feat(foo): add bar dependency (#NNNN)" npx corepack yarn install git add yarn.lock git commit -m "chore: Update yarn.lock" ``` When force-pushing a rebased branch, the order of the two commits matters: put the lockfile commit *after* the package.json commit, so a reviewer dropping the lockfile commit lands at a still-coherent state. ## Pitfalls - **`git commit --amend` on the package.json commit silently drags the lockfile in if staged.** Stage and commit the lockfile last. - **Accidental combining.** If caught on review, `git reset HEAD~1`, re-stage selectively, and recommit as two. - **Package renames invalidate the lockfile.** Renaming a workspace's directory or `package.json:name` changes the workspace key (`"@scope/@workspace:packages/"`) inside `yarn.lock`. Still ships in its own `chore: Update yarn.lock` commit, regenerated by re-running `npx corepack yarn install` after all renames are in place. Don't hand-edit the workspace key; the install produces the canonical form. ## Notes from the field - _2026-05-13_: adopted from the reference. Session example from PR 71 lives in the journal, not here. - _2026-05-17_: a PR carrying `chore: Update yarn.lock` typically conflicts on the lockfile when rebased onto a moved base (any other PR that touched dependencies has landed in the interim). The workflow that resolved it cleanly: skip the old lockfile commit during rebase, apply any review-feedback fixes on top, then regenerate the lockfile against the new base as its own commit. Source: PR #238 fixer, `journal/entries/2026/05/17/200805Z-message-fixer-3e9fd0.md`. ```sh git rebase origin/ # conflict on yarn.lock git rebase --skip # drop the old lockfile commit # apply review-feedback fixes on top npx corepack yarn install # regenerate lockfile against new base git add yarn.lock git commit -m "chore: Update yarn.lock" ```