Document flexible balance (top-up) mechanism; note pricing is now a governance decision
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
9d07b2cf23
commit
cb55c8b2a9
1 file changed
+2
-2
+2
-2
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ Members currently pay a flat $15/month for a $15/month credit budget. But usage
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### What happens when a member's budget runs out mid-month?
|
### What happens when a member's budget runs out mid-month?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Currently LiteLLM enforces the $15 budget cap — requests stop when it's exhausted.
|
Members have a **flexible balance**, not a hardcoded $15/month. The balance starts at $15 but can be topped up by payments (via Open Collective or another system) through the portal's `/admin/set-balance` endpoint, which pushes the new cap to the member's LiteLLM team budget (chat + API draw from the same balance). LiteLLM enforces the cap — requests stop when it's exhausted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Question:** Should members be able to top up? Should there be a grace period? Should the co-op pool surplus to cover light users?
|
**Question:** Should members be able to top up self-serve? Should there be a grace period? Should the co-op pool surplus to cover light users? (The *mechanism* is built — these are now governance decisions, not technical blockers.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user