Merge naming and provider comparison into one Providers table
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
f3007e4c7b
commit
6a005947a9
1 file changed
+10
-20
@@ -4,29 +4,19 @@ The co-op serves models from multiple providers. This is the single list — bot
|
|||||||
the chat and the API draw from it, so it's the one place to look (and the one
|
the chat and the API draw from it, so it's the one place to look (and the one
|
||||||
place to update).
|
place to update).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Naming
|
## Providers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Models are named `provider/model-name`, so you can choose not just *which* model
|
Models are named `provider/model-name`, so you can choose not just *which* model
|
||||||
but *where* it runs. The provider part tells you the value it stands for:
|
but *where* it runs. Providers differ along two independent axes: **privacy**
|
||||||
|
(how protected your prompts and responses are) and **green energy** (how the
|
||||||
|
compute is powered). These are gradations, not binary switches — and no
|
||||||
|
provider today is best on both.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Provider | Value | What it means |
|
| Provider | Value | Privacy | Green energy | What that means |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
| **Tinfoil** | *private* | Models run inside hardware enclaves (TEEs), and requests/responses are encrypted end-to-end (EHBP), so neither we nor the provider can read your prompts or responses. Verifiable via remote attestation. |
|
| **Tinfoil** | *private* | **Strongest — architectural** | Not a green claim | Runs in hardware enclaves (TEEs) with end-to-end encryption (EHBP), verifiable via remote attestation. Neither we nor Tinfoil can read your prompts or responses at inference time. Energy mix is not disclosed. |
|
||||||
| **GreenPT** | *green* | Models served on 100% renewable energy in the EU. Cleaner energy, but standard (non-enclave) hosting — privacy here is a policy commitment, not architectural. |
|
| **GreenPT** | *green* | **Policy-based** | **Strongest — 100% renewable** | Standard (non-enclave) hosting in the EU; privacy rests on GreenPT's commitments and EU data rules, not on cryptography. Compute runs on 100% renewable energy. |
|
||||||
| **PublicAI** | *public* | (coming soon — publicly developed models.) |
|
| **PublicAI** | *public* | (to be confirmed) | (to be confirmed) | Coming soon — publicly developed models. Details pending. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Provider comparison
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Models differ along two independent axes: **privacy** (how protected your
|
|
||||||
prompts and responses are) and **green energy** (how the compute is powered).
|
|
||||||
These are gradations, not binary switches — and no provider today is best on
|
|
||||||
both.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Provider | Privacy | Green energy | What that means |
|
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||
| **Tinfoil** | **Strongest — architectural** | Not a green claim | Runs in hardware enclaves (TEEs) with end-to-end encryption (EHBP), verifiable via remote attestation. Neither we nor Tinfoil can read your prompts or responses at inference time. Energy mix is not disclosed. |
|
|
||||||
| **GreenPT** | **Policy-based** | **Strongest — 100% renewable** | Standard (non-enclave) hosting in the EU; privacy rests on GreenPT's commitments and EU data rules, not on cryptography. Compute runs on 100% renewable energy. |
|
|
||||||
| **PublicAI** | (to be confirmed) | (to be confirmed) | Coming soon — publicly developed models. Details pending. |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Reading the gradations:**
|
**Reading the gradations:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user